Search results for: "label/right%20to%20control"

The NHS consti­tu­tion has been around since January 2009.

It’s a promise from the NHS to you that they will look after you prop­erly, and that you have a right to be looked after well when you need to use NHS services like hospitals, doctors and dentists.

It’s taken a while to get there, but from January 2010 all the different organ­isa­tions that make up the NHS will have to pay special atten­tion to what it says when they make their decisions about how you’re going to get medical care.

The NHS Constitution gives you the right to:

  • free health­care, except what the govern­ment says you should pay
  • high stand­ards when you need advice or treatment
  • access medi­cines, as long as they’ve been prop­erly approved
  • fair and equal treat­ment, no favouritism
  • refuse treat­ment if you want
  • under­stand what your options are
  • choose who you want to be your doctor
  • have a say in the treat­ment and care you get

The govern­ment says it’s ready to add some more rights for you.

The right to not wait longer than 18 weeks for the medical care you need, and only 2 weeks if the doctor thinks you might have cancer. You may still need to wait longer if it’s important to wait for the good of your health.

You would have this right from April 2010.

The govern­ment doesn’t want this to be an excuse for people to sue the NHS whenever the waiting time goes over the limit. Instead they want it to be a way for people who’ve waited too long to get seen as quickly as possible.

If you do end up waiting too long, without agreeing it with your doctor first, then when you tell the NHS about it they will legally have to get you the appoint­ment you need, or find another way.

This doesn’t apply if you miss your appoint­ments, though. It’s your respons­ib­ility to make sure you turn up or cancel them in plenty of time if you can’t get to them.

Understanding waiting times

  • The govern­ment wants to help you under­stand how long you should expect getting treat­ment to take, and they’re thinking about giving out treat­ment plans so you can under­stand what you have to do.
  • They’re also worried that in urgent cases like cancer, although doctors might have a very good reason for not explaining that you need to see a specialist quickly, so you get less stressed and worried by it, this some­times means that people put off their appoint­ments, which could be dangerous.
  • The govern­ment says that if there’s a major national or local problem, for example a flu pandemic, NHS services would be allowed to have longer waiting times.

If you’re over 40 years old but younger than 75, you would get the right to a health check every five years. This health check would test you for common prob­lems – heart disease, stroke, diabetes and kidney disease and more.


Everyone would have this right from April 2012.

As part of the check, the doctor or nurse who give you the check would also help you with things like keeping healthy, how to get to and keep to the right weight, and how to stop smoking as all these things help make you less likely to get the diseases they’re checking for.

They’ll also be able to sort you out with medical treat­ments like statins, which help lower cholesterol.

The govern­ment also wants to talk about what rights they should be thinking about for the future.

  • In the government’s last survey, a lot of people thought that being tied to a GP surgery because you live in a partic­ular area wasn’t very useful, so the govern­ment is already getting rid of that.
  • People also thought that if doctor’s surgeries opened on even­ings and week­ends then life would be much easier for them. The govern­ment wants to think about making this part of the NHS constitution.
  • The NHS thinks it can give everyone access to an NHS dentist by March 2011. When they hit that target, the govern­ment wants to think about putting it in the NHS constitution.
  • There are a few pilot schemes around where people just like you are being given the money to get the care they want. When these pilot schemes have finished and the govern­ment has seen the results, they’ll look at putting it in the NHS constitution.
  • When you’re at the end of your life, you might want to spend that time at home instead of in a hospital. There’s lots of things to sort out about how the NHS helps people cope with death before we get to this, but the govern­ment hopes they’ll be in the right place to look at it by 2013.
  • The govern­ment also says that in 2011 and 2012 they want to set a new standard of a week (maximum two weeks) so you can get cancer tests and results done more quickly.
  • They also want every region in England to have a Constitution Champion who can help make hospitals and surgeries ready for ques­tions about the consti­tu­tion and patient rights, and who knows the consti­tu­tion inside out so they can help patients under­stand their rights and responsibilities.

That’s great / really good / really bad / could do with improve­ment – but what can I do about it?


Get your ideas, comments, ques­tions and obser­va­tions to the Department of Health by 5 February 2010:

I said in my last post that I’d been chal­lenged to squish my latest consulta­tion trans­la­tion into 60 seconds, and here it is.

As you’ll know from my previous podcast on carrier bag charges in Wales, I’m not the most confident speaker, but I think this one works much better than the last one.

Got to work on my mono­tone, but I’m going to keep calling it deadpan until I get rid of it…

59 seconds, too. Always have to go one better!

Listen!

I want to be the first to say that a lot of effort has obvi­ously gone into making this consulta­tion appear access­ible, as well as the normal consulta­tion, there’s also an Easy Read version. There are also some great toolkits, including a DVD — the Office for Disability Issues has done a great deal to encourage people to get involved, and long may that continue! We’re all for that sort of thing around here.

However, (isn’t there always a however) it’s not enough. I was surprised how little of the 80 page original paper made it into the 7 page trans­la­tion. So much so that I really feel like I have missed some­thing really crucial. Please, please tell me if I have!

Don’t want to read the trans­la­tion below, you can down­load it. You can also listen to the 60-second version!

Gone in 60 seconds!

Steph Gray has chal­lenged me to shorten this consulta­tion to a 60 second radio burst. I’m not going to pretend I’m not quaking in my size-5s at the thought, but watch this space.

The Easy Read problem

I can’t help but think that most Easy Read versions miss a funda­mental point. They are usually longer than a normal consulta­tion docu­ment. The jargon might be explained, but it’s still there!

These are major stum­bling blocks — if you find it diffi­cult to read or concen­trate for too long, how easy is it to slog through 90 pages and remember 10 or more unfa­miliar terms at the same time? Not easy at all.

The way easy read versions get made needs some serious re-examining. Involving literacy profes­sionals would be a great start. Involving people with literacy prob­lems would be a better one.